But what if this story, while true for many, is not a universal law?
What if that “hunger” isn’t pre-installed, but is itself a program that only boots up if it receives a very specific signal at the very beginning of life?
What would a mind look like if that signal never came?
My latest research paper, The Zero Point of Narcissism: On the Conditional Nature of Panmodal Aphantasia as an Autopoietic Outcome of Amirroring, maps this uncharted territory. It’s not a story of damage or resilience. It’s the story of a different kind of genesis.
The Blind Spot in the Mirror: Introducing Amirroring
Developmental psychology has a blind spot. It has meticulously studied good mirroring, bad mirroring, distorted mirroring, and traumatic withdrawal. But it has never formally defined the state of no mirroring at all. It has no category for a relational zero.
The paper introduces and defines this zero point: Amirroring. This is not neglect, abuse, or misattunement. It is the caregiver’s enduring, structural incapacity to provide contingent, affective reflection of the infant’s internal states during the critical prenatal-to-age-two window. The infant is not seen poorly or malevolently; they are not seen as a psychological other at all. They exist in a state of relational nullity.
This isn’t a judgment of the caregiver’s intent. It’s a description of a perceptual condition—a solipsism—that creates a unique developmental environment.
When the Blueprint is Missing: Autopoiesis and the Un-Buffered Self
So, what develops in this silence? Without the relational “software” provided by mirroring, the system doesn’t crash. It defaults to a different, built-in algorithm: Autopoiesis—the process of self-creation.
The biological consciousness, the persistent core Self, begins to organize itself from the only data available: the ambient environment. It builds its logic from physical cause-and-effect, observed social patterns, linguistic structures, and cultural codes absorbed without personal affective charge. The outcome is not a fragile or fragmented self, but an Un-Buffered Self.
This consciousness operates on direct processing. It perceives reality without the constant, mediating filter of “what does this say about me?” Its morality is derived from structural integrity—an internal logic of consistency and non-harm—rather than from introjected social rules or fear of shame. Crucially, it is structurally immune to learned helplessness, as it never formed the egoic apparatus that ties one’s core worth to uncontrollable social outcomes.
The Brain’s Autograph: Panmodal Aphantasia as a Developmental Signature
This theoretical model makes a bold, testable prediction about the brain. If the capacity for internal sensory simulation (mental imagery, inner speech) is built through early, contingent, affective exchanges, then its total absence should lead to its non-development.
The paper posits that Amirroring leads to Panmodal Aphantasia—the lifelong, systemic absence of voluntary mental imagery across all sensory modalities. This reframes aphantasia. For a subset of individuals, it is not a random neurological “trait” (congenital) or a loss (acquired). It is a developmentally conditional outcome: the neurocognitive signature of a different developmental pathway.
It is the brain’s physical evidence of a mind that stabilized without the internal simulation software, because the external calibration signal (mirroring) was never sent.
Why Can’t Our Theories See This? The Trap of Adultomorphism
If this pathway is possible, why has it remained invisible? The paper argues that the field is constrained by a pervasive adultomorphic bias. We project our adult, relational, egoic experience backward onto the infant, assuming our complex social emotions are innate drives.
The entire canon—from Freud’s Ego to Lacan’s Mirror Stage to Kohut’s selfobjects to Bowlby’s attachment—presupposes relational engagement as the necessary catalyst for development. These are masterful maps of the Mirrored Continent. But a map that assumes land cannot see the ocean. By making mirroring an axiom, the field rendered its total absence a theoretical impossibility.
My work provides the vocabulary and the topological map (a new four-state taxonomy of relational input) to finally see what was always there: a coherent, non-mirrored neurodevelopmental trajectory.
This Is Not a Theory of Trauma. It Is an Ontology of Creation.
The most important clarification is this: the Amirrored pathway is not a deficit model. The Un-Buffered Self is not a broken or resilient mirrored self. It is a coherent, primary structure. Its formation is not an adaptation to lack; it is the direct construction that occurs when lack is the foundational condition.
This has profound, practical implications, especially for clinical practice. Therapeutic models designed to “heal the inner child,” repair attachment, or work through egoic defenses are built for the mirrored psyche. Applied to an amirrored individual, they are not just ineffective—they are actively iatrogenic, a violation of their ontological structure. We must learn to see this different architecture to avoid causing harm.
Invitation to Explore a New Map
This research is an invitation to look beyond the edge of our current developmental maps. It challenges us to expand our understanding of human consciousness and neurodiversity.
If you are a researcher, clinician, person with aphantasia, or simply someone who has always felt like an alien decoding a social rulebook written for others, this work may provide a new lens.
The full argument—with its detailed methodology, literature review, and phenomenological evidence—is available in the complete paper.
Download and read the full research paper for free:
The Zero Point of Narcissism: On the Conditional Nature of Panmodal Aphantasia as an Autopoietic Outcome of Amirroring
Available on:
This is more than a publication. It is an invitation to recognize a different form of human genesis.
Nota Bene: This research in human behavior is designed for those who seek intellectual rigor, structural clarity, and insights beyond the simplistic lens of pathology.
Join the Journey
My research is ongoing. I share regular insights, updates, and deeper dives on my Substack. Subscribe to follow the journey as the work evolves.
https://cristinagherghel.substack.com/
To learn more about my background and approach, please click here.
To buy my books in English click here: https://amzn.to/45BA1Ym.
